scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1006224
See also the articles by \textit{R. Tobies} [ibid., 117-130 (1996; Zbl 0907.01032)] and \textit{D. E. Rowe} [ibid., 131-145 (1996; Zbl 0907.01024)]. Was Grassmann's contribution to mathematics recognized late? If so, why? Probably not late: his collected works were early compared with others, e.g. Dirichlet, and unusual, because he was not attached to a University or an Academy; his partisans were restricted and negative; his methods were overshadowed by quaternions at the time, and the notation for vectors and their products caused untold strife, even more than that revealed in the article by \textit{K. Reich} [ibid., 197-210 (1996; Zbl 0907.01023)]. For the entire collection see [Zbl 0853.00027].
- On the early appraisals in Russia of H. and R. Grassmann's achievements
- Grassmann's contribution to mathematics
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1006234 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1006235 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1006236 (Why is no real title available?)
- Debating Grassmann's mathematics: Schlegel versus Klein
This page was built for publication:
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4335822)