The effectiveness of bootstrap methods in evaluating skewed auditing populations: a simulation study

DOI10.1080/00949659608811731zbMATH Open0906.62039OpenAlexW1989090424MaRDI QIDQ4355607FDOQ4355607

Authors: Howard R. Clayton 

Publication date: 21 September 1997

Published in: Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00949659608811731

Recommendations

• Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy
• Bootstrap and other methods to measure errors in survey estimates
• Publication:3490775
• Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. With a comment by J. A. Hartigan and a rejoinder by the authors
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1264857

zbMATH Keywords

confidence boundsbootstrap methodsdollar unit sampling\(t\)-pivot

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Sampling theory, sample surveys (62D05) Nonparametric statistical resampling methods (62G09) Nonparametric tolerance and confidence regions (62G15)

Cites Work

• Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife
• Theoretical comparison of bootstrap confidence intervals
• Nonparametric Confidence Limits by Resampling Methods and Least Favorable Families
• Nonparametric standard errors and confidence intervals

Cited In (1)

• Combining approaches for evaluating auditing populations: A simulation study

This page was built for publication: The effectiveness of bootstrap methods in evaluating skewed auditing populations: a simulation study

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4355607)