A Two-Stage Selection and Testing Design for Comparing Several Normal Means with a Standard: The Case of Common, Known Variance
DOI10.1081/SQA-120026885zbMATH Open1030.62014OpenAlexW1981278723MaRDI QIDQ4439628FDOQ4439628
Authors: Linda M. Rollin, Pinyuen Chen 
Publication date: 14 December 2003
Published in: Sequential Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1081/sqa-120026885
Recommendations
- A Two-Stage Selection and Testing Design for Comparing Several Normal Means with a Standard
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 218753
- A two-stage procedure for selecting the largest normal mean whose first stage selects a bounded random number of populations
- Selecting the Best Population, Provided It Is Better than a Control: The Unequal Variance Case
- Two-stage selection and testing designs for comparative clinical trials
Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Statistical ranking and selection procedures (62F07) Sequential statistical analysis (62L10)
Cites Work
Cited In (9)
- Normal approximation for two-stage winner design
- A selection and testing procedure for comparing several experimental treatments with a control
- A Two-Stage Selection and Testing Design for Comparing Several Normal Means with a Standard
- A Personal Tribute to Milton Sobel: Selecting the Best Treatment
- A two-stage design for comparative clinical trials: the heteroscedastic solution
- Two-stage selection and testing designs for comparative clinical trials
- A two-stage procedure on comparing several experimental treatments and a control -- the common and unknown variance case
- Selection of the Better of Two Treatments when They May Not be Equivalent
- Title not available (Why is that?)
This page was built for publication: A Two-Stage Selection and Testing Design for Comparing Several Normal Means with a Standard: The Case of Common, Known Variance
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4439628)
