Ideals without ccc and without property \boldsymbol( \mathbf{M} \boldsymbol)
In this paper the author improves a theorem of \textit{M. Balcerzak, A. Roslanowski} and \textit{S. Shelah} [J. Symb. Log. 63, 128-148 (1998; Zbl 0899.03035)] by constructing a Borel \(\sigma\)-ideal \(I\) of subsets of a Polish space \(X\) with the following properties: \(I\) has a \(\Pi^1_1\) definition, both the ccc and property (M) fail for \(I\), but \(I\) satisfies the \(\omega_2\)-cc. The proof uses no set-theoretic assumptions beyond ZFC and this is one of the improvements over the previous result. \(I\) is defined using orbits of the logic action (see e.g. \textit{H. Becker} and \textit{A. S. Kechris}, The descriptive set theory of Polish group actions [London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 232, Cambride Univ. Press, Cambridge (1996; Zbl 0949.54052)]) for the language with one binary relation symbol.
- On some \sigma -ideal without ccc
- On properties of \(M\)-ideals
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 911976
- Commutative ideal theory without finiteness conditions: Primal ideals
- On ideals having the *-property
- \(M\)-cancellation ideals
- Commutative ideal theory without finiteness conditions: Completely irreducible ideals
- M-ideals and propery SU
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3881288
- Commutative ideal theory without finiteness conditions: irreducibility in the quotient field
- Can ideals without ccc be interesting?
- Descriptive set theory
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 722611 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 976831 (Why is no real title available?)
- Ideals without ccc
- Model theory for infinitary logic. Logic with countable conjunctions and finite quantifiers
- The topological Vaught's conjecture and minimal counterexamples
This page was built for publication: Ideals without ccc and without property $ \boldsymbol( \mathbf{M} \boldsymbol)$
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4501094)