Detecting random-effects model misspecification via coarsened data
From MaRDI portal
Publication:452664
DOI10.1016/J.CSDA.2010.06.012zbMATH Open1247.62194OpenAlexW2055819614MaRDI QIDQ452664FDOQ452664
Authors: Xianzheng Huang 
Publication date: 15 September 2012
Published in: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2010.06.012
Recommendations
- Diagnosis of Random‐Effect Model Misspecification in Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Binary Response
- A family of tests to detect misspecifications in the random-effects structure of generalized linear mixed models
- Diagnosing misspecification of the random‐effects distribution in mixed models
- Testing for misspecification in generalized linear mixed models
- Misspecifying the shape of a random effects distribution: why getting it wrong may not matter
General nonlinear regression (62J02) Diagnostics, and linear inference and regression (62J20) Generalized linear models (logistic models) (62J12)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models
- Semiparametric theory and missing data.
- Consequences and Detection of Misspecified Nonlinear Regression Models
- Specification Tests in Econometrics
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The effect of misspecifying the random-effects distribution in linear mixed models for longitudinal data
- Misspecified maximum likelihood estimates and generalized linear mixed models
- A diagnostic test for the mixing distribution in a generalised linear mixed model
- Diagnosis of Random‐Effect Model Misspecification in Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Binary Response
- The nonlinear mixed effects model with a smooth random effects density
- Type I and Type II Error Under Random‐Effects Misspecification in Generalized Linear Mixed Models
- Examples in which misspecification of a random effects distribution reduces efficiency, and possible remedies
- Ignorability and coarse data
- A note on a goodness-of-fit test for the logistic regression model
- Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model
- Assessing normality in random effects models
- Consequences of misspecifying assumptions in nonlinear mixed effects models.
- Goodness-of-Fit Tests for GEE Modeling with Binary Responses
- On measuring sensitivity to parametric model misspecification
- Goodness-of-fit Tests for Mixed Models
- A Simulation‐based Goodness‐of‐fit Test for Random Effects in Generalized Linear Mixed Models
- Goodness-of-Fit in Generalized Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models
- Chi-squared goodness-of-fit tests for the proportional hazards regression model
- A New Method to Explore the Distribution of Interindividual Random Effects in Non-Linear Mixed Effects Models
- Nonparametric estimation in nonlinear mixed effects models
Cited In (10)
- Link misspecification in generalized linear mixed models with a random intercept for binary responses
- Residual analysis of linear mixed models using a simulation approach
- A family of tests to detect misspecifications in the random-effects structure of generalized linear mixed models
- Random Effects Misspecification Can Have Severe Consequences for Random Effects Inference in Linear Mixed Models
- Detecting misspecification in the random-effects structure of cumulative logit models
- Random-intercept misspecification in generalized linear mixed models for binary responses
- Generalized linear models with clustered data: fixed and random effects models
- Pooling designs for outcomes under a Gaussian random effects model
- Goodness-of-fit tests of generalized linear mixed models for repeated ordinal responses
- Misspecifying the shape of a random effects distribution: why getting it wrong may not matter
This page was built for publication: Detecting random-effects model misspecification via coarsened data
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q452664)
