Reply to ‘Lifshitz-point critical behaviour toO(ϵL2)’
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4534825
Abstract: We reply to a recent comment by H. W. Diehl and M. Shpot (cond-mat/0106502) criticizing our paper J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 (2001) L327-332. We show that the approximation we use for evaluating higher-loop integrals is consistent with homogeneity. A new renormalization group approach is presented in order to compare the two methods with high-precision numerical data concerning the uniaxial case. We stress that the isotropic behaviour cannot be obtained from the anisotropic one.
Recommendations
- Liftshitz-point critical behaviour to O(ϵ2)
- Anisotropic Lifshitz point at \(O(\epsilon^2_L)\)
- Surface critical behaviour at m-axial Lifshitz points: continuum models, boundary conditions and two-loop renormalization group results
- Isotropic Lifshitz point in the \(O(N)\) theory
- Compatibility of 1/nand ϵ expansions for critical exponents atm-axial Lifshitz points
- Two-loop renormalization-group analysis of critical behavior at m-axial Lifshitz points
- Reply to the comment on `Phase transition of a two-dimensional generalized XY model'
- Isotropic Lifshitz critical behavior from the functional renormalization group
- Surface critical behaviour atm-axial Lifshitz points: continuum models, boundary conditions and two-loop renormalization group results
- Reply to “Comment on ‘Fluctuation-dominated phase ordering at a mixed order transition’”
Cited in
(2)
This page was built for publication: Reply to ‘Lifshitz-point critical behaviour toO(ϵL2)’
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4534825)
