Which cosmological model-with dark energy or modified FRW dynamics?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:453987
DOI10.1016/J.PHYSLETB.2005.12.049zbMATH Open1247.83304arXivastro-ph/0509415OpenAlexW2090468078WikidataQ125885973 ScholiaQ125885973MaRDI QIDQ453987FDOQ453987
Authors: Marek Szydłowski, Włodzimierz Godłowski 
Publication date: 30 September 2012
Published in: Physics Letters B (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: Recent measurements of distant type Ia supernovae (SNIa) as well as other observations indicate that our universe is in accelerating phase of expansion. In principle there are two alternative explanation for such an acceleration. While in the first approach an unknown form of energy violating the strong energy condition is postulated, in second one some modification of FRW dynamics is postulated. The both approaches are in well agreement with present day observations which is the manifestation of the degeneracy problem appearing in observational cosmology. We use the Akaike (AIC) and Bayesian (BIC) information criteria of model selection to overcome this degeneracy and to determine a model with such a set of parameters which gives the most preferred fit to the SNIa data. We consider five representative evolutional scenarios in each of groups. Among dark energy proposal the CDM model, CDM model with phantom field, CDM model with topological defect, model with Chaplygin gas, and the model with the linear dynamical equation of state parameter. As an alternative prototype scenarios we consider: brane world Dvali Gabadadze Porrati scenario, brane models in Randall-Sundrum scenario, Cardassian models with dust matter and radiation, bouncing model with the cosmological constant and metric-affine gravity (MAG) inspired cosmological models. Applying the model selection criteria we show that both AIC and BIC indicates that additional contribution arises from nonstandard FRW dynamics are not necessary to explain SNIa. Adopting the model selection information criteria we show that the AIC indicates the flat phantom model while BIC indicates both flat phantom and flat CDM models.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0509415
Recommendations
Cites Work
- Estimating the dimension of a model
- A new look at the statistical model identification
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The cosmological constant and dark energy
- Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension
- An Alternative to Compactification
- Cardassian expansion: a model in which the universe is flat, matter dominated, and accelerating
- 4D gravity on a brane in 5D Minkowski space
- The cosmological constant problem and quintessence
- An alternative to quintessence
- Cosmology on a brane in Minkowski bulk
- Generalized Chaplygin gas as a unified scenario of dark matter/energy: Observational constraints
- Brane universes tested by supernovae Ia
- Cosmological parameters from supernova observations: A critical comparison of three data sets
- Testing non-standard cosmological models with supernovae
- BRANE UNIVERSES TESTED AGAINST ASTRONOMICAL DATA
Cited In (12)
- Constraints on alternative models to dark energy
- Constraints on variable Chaplygin gas model from type Ia supernovae and baryon acoustic oscillations
- Constraint on the kinematical and dynamical model from the latest observational data
- Reduced modified Chaplygin gas cosmology
- DARK MATTER AND DARK ENERGY AS EFFECTS OF MODIFIED GRAVITY
- ACCELERATION OF THE UNIVERSE DRIVEN BY THE CASIMIR FORCE
- DYNAMICS OF DARK ENERGY
- CONSTRAINTS ON A NEW ALTERNATIVE MODEL TO DARK ENERGY
- An interacting dark energy model in a non-flat universe
- Second-order invariants and holography
- Combined constraints on modified Chaplygin gas model from cosmological observed data: Markov chain Monte Carlo approach
- COSMOLOGICAL MODEL SELECTION: STATISTICS AND PHYSICS
This page was built for publication: Which cosmological model-with dark energy or modified FRW dynamics?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q453987)
