Abstract: John organized a state lottery and his wife won the main prize. You may feel that the event of her winning wasn't particularly random, but how would you argue that in a fair court of law? Traditional probability theory does not even have the notion of random events. Algorithmic information theory does, but it is not applicable to real-world scenarios like the lottery one. We attempt to rectify that.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3427210 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3522963 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1734441 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1168330 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3278985 (Why is no real title available?)
- A universal algorithm for sequential data compression
- Algorithmic Information Theory
- Algorithmic Information Theory and Foundations of Probability
- Compression of individual sequences via variable-rate coding
- Fundamentals of clinical trials.
- Markov logic networks
- On the Length of Programs for Computing Finite Binary Sequences
- Probability and finance. It's only a game!
- Randomness conservation inequalities; information and independence in mathematical theories
- Shared Information and Program Plagiarism Detection
- The Design Inference
- The miraculous universal distribution
- Weak Second‐Order Arithmetic and Finite Automata
Cited in
(4)
This page was built for publication: Impugning randomness, convincingly
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q454396)