Impugning randomness, convincingly

From MaRDI portal
Publication:454396

DOI10.1007/S11225-012-9375-1zbMATH Open1262.68054arXiv1601.00665OpenAlexW2017818707WikidataQ125936911 ScholiaQ125936911MaRDI QIDQ454396FDOQ454396


Authors: Yuri Gurevich, Grant Olney Passmore Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 1 October 2012

Published in: Studia Logica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: John organized a state lottery and his wife won the main prize. You may feel that the event of her winning wasn't particularly random, but how would you argue that in a fair court of law? Traditional probability theory does not even have the notion of random events. Algorithmic information theory does, but it is not applicable to real-world scenarios like the lottery one. We attempt to rectify that.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.00665




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (4)





This page was built for publication: Impugning randomness, convincingly

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q454396)