Statistical Inference as Severe Testing

DOI10.1017/9781107286184zbMATH Open1400.62002OpenAlexW4211020619MaRDI QIDQ4581189FDOQ4581189

Authors: Deborah G. Mayo 

Publication date: 23 August 2018

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107286184

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7392015
• Book Review
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 821288
• Severity and Trustworthy Evidence: Foundational Problems versus Misuses of Frequentist Testing
• Statistical hypothesis testing in context. Reproducibility, inference, and science
• The Myth of Statistical Inference
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7451125

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01) Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to statistics (62-02)

Cited In (25)

• Revisiting noncentrality-based confidence intervals, error probabilities and estimation-based effect sizes
• The fate of tensor-vector-scalar modified gravity
• Statistical Guidance to Authors at Top-Ranked Journals across Scientific Disciplines
• Severity and Trustworthy Evidence: Foundational Problems versus Misuses of Frequentist Testing
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Error and inference. Recent exchanges on experimental reasoning, reliability, and the objectivity and rationality of science
• Possibility-theoretic statistical inference offers performance and probativeness assurances
• On the Elusive Formalisation of the Risky Condition for Hypothesis Testing
• A battle in the statistics wars: a simulation-based comparison of Bayesian, frequentist and Williamsonian methodologies
• Maximum entropy derived and generalized under idempotent probability to address Bayes-frequentist uncertainty and model revision uncertainty: an information-theoretic semantics for possibility theory
• Discussion of “Divergence vs. Decision P$$ P $$‐values: A Distinction Worth Making in Theory and Keeping in Practice – or, How Divergence P$$ P $$‐values Measure Evidence Even When Decision P$$ P $$‐values Do Not” by Sander Greenland
• Severe testing of Benford's law
• Scientific self-correction: the Bayesian way
• Bayesianism from a philosophical perspective and its application to medicine
• Statistics, philosophy, and health: the SMAC 2021 webconference
• Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”
• Why the empirical sciences need statistics so desperately
• The Selective Confirmation Answer to the Paradox of the Ravens
• A possibility-theoretic solution to Basu's Bayesian-frequentist via media
• False confidence, non-additive beliefs, and valid statistical inference
• Expanding theory testing in general relativity: LIGO and parametrized theories
• A Taxonomy of Major Premises and Implications for Falsification and Verification
• Severe testing of climate change hypotheses
• Severe Testing as a Basic Concept in a Neyman–Pearson Philosophy of Induction
• Error statistical modeling and inference: where methodology meets ontology

This page was built for publication: Statistical Inference as Severe Testing

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4581189)