Symmetric Cauchy stresses do not imply symmetric Biot strains in weak formulations of isotropic hyperelasticity with rotational degrees of freedom.

DOI10.1002/PAMM.200810419MaRDI QIDQ4582281zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Patrizio Neff, Andreas Fischle, I. Münch

Publication date 23 August 2018

Published in PAMM (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.200810419

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Small-strain, rate-independent theories of plasticity (including rigid-plastic and elasto-plastic materials) (74C05)

Recommendations

• Symmetric Cauchy stresses do not imply symmetric Biot strains in weak formulations of isotropic hyperelasticity with rotational degrees of freedom
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1022715
• Linear isotropic relations in finite hyperelasticity: some general results
• Hyperelastic bodies under homogeneous Cauchy stress induced by three-dimensional non-homogeneous deformations
• The Biot stresses in nonlinear elasticity and the associated generalized variational principles

Cited in

(3)

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1022715 (Why is no real title available?)
• The geometrically nonlinear Cosserat micropolar shear–stretch energy. Part II: Non‐classical energy‐minimizing microrotations in 3D and their computational validation***
• Symmetric Cauchy stresses do not imply symmetric Biot strains in weak formulations of isotropic hyperelasticity with rotational degrees of freedom

This page was built for publication: Symmetric Cauchy stresses do not imply symmetric Biot strains in weak formulations of isotropic hyperelasticity with rotational degrees of freedom.

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4582281)