Rewriting recursive aggregates in answer set programming: back to monotonicity

From MaRDI portal
Publication:4592997

DOI10.1017/S1471068415000228zbMATH Open1379.68034arXiv1507.03923OpenAlexW3104110719MaRDI QIDQ4592997FDOQ4592997

Martin Gebser, Wolfgang Faber, M. Alviano

Publication date: 9 November 2017

Published in: Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Aggregation functions are widely used in answer set programming for representing and reasoning on knowledge involving sets of objects collectively. Current implementations simplify the structure of programs in order to optimize the overall performance. In particular, aggregates are rewritten into simpler forms known as monotone aggregates. Since the evaluation of normal programs with monotone aggregates is in general on a lower complexity level than the evaluation of normal programs with arbitrary aggregates, any faithful translation function must introduce disjunction in rule heads in some cases. However, no function of this kind is known. The paper closes this gap by introducing a polynomial, faithful, and modular translation for rewriting common aggregation functions into the simpler form accepted by current solvers. A prototype system allows for experimenting with arbitrary recursive aggregates, which are also supported in the recent version 4.5 of the grounder extsc{gringo}, using the methods presented in this paper. To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP), Proceedings of ICLP 2015.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.03923




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (13)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: Rewriting recursive aggregates in answer set programming: back to monotonicity

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4592997)