k-center clustering under perturbation resilience

DOI10.4230/LIPICS.ICALP.2016.68MaRDI QIDQ4598207zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Maria-Florina Balcan, Nika Haghtalab, Colin White

Publication date 19 December 2017

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.03924

zbMATH Keywords

perturbation resilience\(k\)-center clustering

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity (68Q25) Computational difficulty of problems (lower bounds, completeness, difficulty of approximation, etc.) (68Q17) Approximation algorithms (68W25)

Abstract: The $k$-center problem is a canonical and long-studied facility location and clustering problem with many applications in both its symmetric and asymmetric forms. Both versions of the problem have tight approximation factors on worst case instances. Therefore to improve on these ratios, one must go beyond the worst case. In this work, we take this approach and provide strong positive results both for the asymmetric and symmetric $k$-center problems under a natural input stability (promise) condition called $alpha$-perturbation resilience [Bilu and Linia 2012], which states that the optimal solution does not change under any alpha-factor perturbation to the input distances. We provide algorithms that give strong guarantees simultaneously for stable and non-stable instances: our algorithms always inherit the worst-case guarantees of clustering approximation algorithms, and output the optimal solution if the input is $2$-perturbation resilient. Furthermore, we prove our result is tight by showing symmetric $k$-center under $(2-epsilon)$-perturbation resilience is hard unless $NP=RP$. The impact of our results are multifaceted. This is the first tight result for any problem under perturbation resilience. Furthermore, our results illustrate a surprising relationship between symmetric and asymmetric $k$-center instances under perturbation resilience. Unlike approximation ratio, for which symmetric $k$-center is easily solved to a factor of 2 but asymmetric $k$-center cannot be approximated to any constant factor, both symmetric and asymmetric $k$-center can be solved optimally under resilience to 2-perturbations. Finally, our guarantees in the setting where only part of the data satisfies perturbation resilience makes these algorithms more applicable to real-life instances.

Recommendations

• \(k\)-center clustering under perturbation resilience
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7378621
• Algorithms for stable and perturbation-resilient problems

Cited in

(13)

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6902592 (Why is no real title available?)
• Asymmetric \(k\)-center is \(\log{^*}{n}\)-hard to approximate
• Resilient \(k\)-d trees: \(k\)-means in space revisited
• Mechanism design for perturbation stable combinatorial auctions
• Algorithms for stable and perturbation-resilient problems
• \(k\)-center clustering under perturbation resilience
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7378621 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7758333 (Why is no real title available?)
• Bilu-Linial stability, certified algorithms and the independent set problem
• Strategyproof facility location in perturbation stable instances
• Stability and recovery for independence systems
• On perturbation resilience of non-uniform k-center
• Asymmetric k -center is log ^* n -hard to approximate

This page was built for publication: \(k\)-center clustering under perturbation resilience

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4598207)