k-center clustering under perturbation resilience
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4598207
DOI10.4230/LIPICS.ICALP.2016.68zbMATH Open1388.68098arXiv1505.03924OpenAlexW2963896776MaRDI QIDQ4598207FDOQ4598207
Authors: Maria-Florina Balcan, Nika Haghtalab, Colin White
Publication date: 19 December 2017
Abstract: The -center problem is a canonical and long-studied facility location and clustering problem with many applications in both its symmetric and asymmetric forms. Both versions of the problem have tight approximation factors on worst case instances. Therefore to improve on these ratios, one must go beyond the worst case. In this work, we take this approach and provide strong positive results both for the asymmetric and symmetric -center problems under a natural input stability (promise) condition called -perturbation resilience [Bilu and Linia 2012], which states that the optimal solution does not change under any alpha-factor perturbation to the input distances. We provide algorithms that give strong guarantees simultaneously for stable and non-stable instances: our algorithms always inherit the worst-case guarantees of clustering approximation algorithms, and output the optimal solution if the input is -perturbation resilient. Furthermore, we prove our result is tight by showing symmetric -center under -perturbation resilience is hard unless . The impact of our results are multifaceted. This is the first tight result for any problem under perturbation resilience. Furthermore, our results illustrate a surprising relationship between symmetric and asymmetric -center instances under perturbation resilience. Unlike approximation ratio, for which symmetric -center is easily solved to a factor of 2 but asymmetric -center cannot be approximated to any constant factor, both symmetric and asymmetric -center can be solved optimally under resilience to 2-perturbations. Finally, our guarantees in the setting where only part of the data satisfies perturbation resilience makes these algorithms more applicable to real-life instances.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.03924
Recommendations
Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity (68Q25) Computational difficulty of problems (lower bounds, completeness, difficulty of approximation, etc.) (68Q17) Approximation algorithms (68W25)
Cited In (13)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Asymmetric \(k\)-center is \(\log{^*}{n}\)-hard to approximate
- Resilient \(k\)-d trees: \(k\)-means in space revisited
- Mechanism design for perturbation stable combinatorial auctions
- Algorithms for stable and perturbation-resilient problems
- \(k\)-center clustering under perturbation resilience
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Bilu-Linial stability, certified algorithms and the independent set problem
- Strategyproof facility location in perturbation stable instances
- Stability and recovery for independence systems
- On perturbation resilience of non-uniform \(k\)-center
- Asymmetric k -center is log * n -hard to approximate
This page was built for publication: \(k\)-center clustering under perturbation resilience
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4598207)