Are increased costs worth paying to raise non‐monetary utility?: Analysis of intrinsic motivation and fringe benefits

DOI10.1111/J.1475-3995.2008.00633.XzbMATH Open1377.91091OpenAlexW2067117203MaRDI QIDQ4600629FDOQ4600629

Authors: Ryohei Matsumura, Norimasa Kobayashi 

Publication date: 12 January 2018

Published in: International Transactions in Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3995.2008.00633.x

Recommendations

• An analysis of an incentive problem considering non‐monetary utility
• Incremental willingness to pay: a theoretical and empirical exposition
• The monetary utility premium and interpersonal comparisons
• ENHANCING EFFORT SUPPLY WITH PRIZE‐AUGMENTING ENTRY FEES: THEORY AND EXPERIMENTS
• Are non-contingent incentives more effective in motivating \textit{new} behavior? Evidence from the field
• Weighing up the benefits of work: behavioral and neural analyses of effort-related decision making
• The experimetrics of public goods: inferring motivations from contributions
• Subjective expected utility theory with costly actions

zbMATH Keywords

agency modelfringe benefitsintrinsic motivationincentive systemnon-monetary utility

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Utility theory (91B16)

Cited In (1)

• Job challenge as a motivator in a principal-agent setting

This page was built for publication: Are increased costs worth paying to raise non‐monetary utility?: Analysis of intrinsic motivation and fringe benefits

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4600629)