Are non-contingent incentives more effective in motivating \textit{new} behavior? Evidence from the field

DOI10.1016/J.GEB.2021.10.001MaRDI QIDQ2667282zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Yanyan Li

Publication date 24 November 2021

Published in Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2021.10.001

zbMATH Keywords

behavior changenon-contingent incentivesprosocial behaviorrecyclingselectionsorting

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Experimental work for problems pertaining to game theory, economics, and finance (91-05) Decision theory (91B06)

Recommendations

• What motivates effort? Evidence and expert forecasts
• On the validity of the random lottery incentive system
• The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. (With commentaries)
• Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation
• Framing of incentives and effort provision

Cites work

• A theory of sequential reciprocity
• A tractable model of reciprocity and fairness
• Gift Exchange in the Field
• Putting Behavioral Economics to Work: Testing for Gift Exchange in Labor Markets Using Field Experiments

Cited in

(6)

• Does a short-term increase in incentives boost performance?
• Social influence and economic incentives: complements or substitutes? -- The case of fighting crimes
• Non-monetary incentives in online experiments
• Are increased costs worth paying to raise non‐monetary utility?: Analysis of intrinsic motivation and fringe benefits
• What motivates effort? Evidence and expert forecasts
• HETEROGENEOUS TREATMENT EFFECTS OF NUDGE AND REBATE: CAUSAL MACHINE LEARNING IN A FIELD EXPERIMENT ON ELECTRICITY CONSERVATION

This page was built for publication: Are non-contingent incentives more effective in motivating \textit{new} behavior? Evidence from the field

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2667282)