Posterior predictive checks can and should be Bayesian: Comment on Gelman and Shalizi, ``Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics

DOI10.1111/J.2044-8317.2012.02063.XMaRDI QIDQ4614593zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors John K. Kruschke

Publication date 31 January 2019

Published in British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02063.x

zbMATH Keywords

Bayesian statisticsphilosophy

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01) Bayesian problems; characterization of Bayes procedures (62C10) Bayesian inference (62F15)

Recommendations

• Posterior predictive \(p\)-values
• Two simple examples for understanding posterior \(p\)-values whose distributions are far from unform
• Comparative investigation of three Bayesian p values
• Alternatives to post-processing posterior predictive p values
• Posterior predictive checks: principles and discussion procedures

Cited in

(9)

• Comparative investigation of three Bayesian p values
• Scoring in context
• Two simple examples for understanding posterior \(p\)-values whose distributions are far from unform
• Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics
• The humble Bayesian: model checking from a fully Bayesian perspective
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 947414 (Why is no real title available?)
• Outlier robust posterior predictive checks
• A note on fiducial model averaging as an alternative to checking Bayesian and frequentist models
• Developing memory-based models of ACT-R within a statistical framework

This page was built for publication: Posterior predictive checks can and should be Bayesian: Comment on Gelman and Shalizi, ``Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4614593)