What the Humean Should Say About Entanglement

DOI10.1111/NOUS.12095MaRDI QIDQ4623314zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Harjit Bhogal, Zee Perry

Publication date 15 February 2019

Published in Nôus (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12095

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05)

Recommendations

• A pragmatist view of the metaphysics of entanglement
• On quantum entanglement, counterfactuals, causality and dispositions
• Quantum entanglement: a hylomorphic account
• Entanglement, Bell inequality and all that
• The logic of entanglement
• Quantum entanglement and a metaphysics of relations
• Individuality, distinguishability, and (non-)entanglement: a defense of Leibniz's principle
• The causal problem of entanglement
• A logical approach to entanglement

Cited in

(17)

• How Humean is Bohumianism?
• Quantum mechanics, time and ontology
• La Bohume
• Why scientific realists should reject the second dogma of quantum mechanics
• From time asymmetry to quantum entanglement: the Humean unification
• There is no measurement problem for Humeans
• Bohmian mechanics: realism and the ``box experiment
• The wave-function as a multi-field
• Wave-functionalism
• Super-Humeanism: a starving ontology
• Separating Einstein's separability
• Loop quantum gravity: a new threat to humeanism? I: The problem of spacetime
• Leibnizian relationalism for general relativistic physics
• Two notions of holism
• Quantum entanglement: a hylomorphic account
• Humeanism in light of quantum gravity
• Is the statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics \(\psi\)-ontic or \(\psi\)-epistemic?

This page was built for publication: What the Humean Should Say About Entanglement

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4623314)