The pragmatic encroachment debate

DOI10.1111/NOUS.12156zbMATH Open1436.03072OpenAlexW2509484917MaRDI QIDQ4623337FDOQ4623337

Authors: Blake Roeber 

Publication date: 15 February 2019

Published in: Nôus (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12156

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1886429
• Implicature and non-local pragmatic encroachment
• Knowledge-to-fact arguments (bootstrapping, closure, paradox and KK)
• Williamson, closure, and KK
• Two claims about epistemic propriety

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42)

Cites Work

• Truth and Probability
• Knowing that \(P\) without believing that \(P\)
• Measuring the overall incoherence of credence functions
• The review paradox: on the diachronic costs of not closing rational belief under conjunction

Cited In (6)

• Impurism, pragmatic encroachment, and the argument from principles
• An epistemic modal norm of practical reasoning
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The epistemic significance of modal factors
• Stakes sensitivity and transformative experience
• Implicature and non-local pragmatic encroachment

This page was built for publication: The pragmatic encroachment debate

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4623337)