The pragmatic encroachment debate

DOI10.1111/NOUS.12156MaRDI QIDQ4623337zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Blake Roeber

Publication date 15 February 2019

Published in Nôus (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12156

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1886429
• Implicature and non-local pragmatic encroachment
• Knowledge-to-fact arguments (bootstrapping, closure, paradox and KK)
• Williamson, closure, and KK
• Two claims about epistemic propriety

Cites work

• Knowing that \(P\) without believing that \(P\)
• Measuring the overall incoherence of credence functions
• The review paradox: on the diachronic costs of not closing rational belief under conjunction
• Truth and Probability

Cited in

(6)

• Impurism, pragmatic encroachment, and the argument from principles
• An epistemic modal norm of practical reasoning
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1886429 (Why is no real title available?)
• The epistemic significance of modal factors
• Stakes sensitivity and transformative experience
• Implicature and non-local pragmatic encroachment

This page was built for publication: The pragmatic encroachment debate

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4623337)