Is the five-flow conjecture almost false?

From MaRDI portal
Publication:463296

DOI10.1016/J.JCTB.2013.06.001zbMATH Open1301.05153arXiv1009.4062OpenAlexW2050188822WikidataQ58082143 ScholiaQ58082143MaRDI QIDQ463296FDOQ463296

Jesper Lykke Jacobsen, Jesús Salas

Publication date: 16 October 2014

Published in: Journal of Combinatorial Theory. Series B (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The number of nowhere zero Z_Q flows on a graph G can be shown to be a polynomial in Q, defining the flow polynomial Phi_G(Q). According to Tutte's five-flow conjecture, Phi_G(5) > 0 for any bridgeless G.A conjecture by Welsh that Phi_G(Q) has no real roots for Q in (4,infty) was recently disproved by Haggard, Pearce and Royle. These authors conjectured the absence of roots for Q in [5,infty). We study the real roots of Phi_G(Q) for a family of non-planar cubic graphs known as generalised Petersen graphs G(m,k). We show that the modified conjecture on real flow roots is also false, by exhibiting infinitely many real flow roots Q>5 within the class G(nk,k). In particular, we compute explicitly the flow polynomial of G(119,7), showing that it has real roots at Qapprox 5.0000197675 and Qapprox 5.1653424423. We moreover prove that the graph families G(6n,6) and G(7n,7) possess real flow roots that accumulate at Q=5 as n oinfty (in the latter case from above and below); and that Q_c(7)approx 5.2352605291 is an accumulation point of real zeros of the flow polynomials for G(7n,7) as n oinfty.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.4062





Cites Work


Cited In (6)

Uses Software






This page was built for publication: Is the five-flow conjecture almost false?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q463296)