Faith's problem on R-projectivity is undecidable

From MaRDI portal
Publication:4644435

DOI10.1090/PROC/14209zbMATH Open1423.16003arXiv1710.10465OpenAlexW3105321254WikidataQ105333596 ScholiaQ105333596MaRDI QIDQ4644435FDOQ4644435


Authors: Jan Trlifaj Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 7 January 2019

Published in: Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In cite{F}, Faith asked for what rings R does the Dual Baer Criterion hold in Mod-R, that is, when does R-projectivity imply projectivity for all right R-modules? Such rings R were called right testing. Sandomierski proved that if R is right perfect, then R is right testing. Puninski et al. cite{AIPY} have recently shown for a number of non-right perfect rings that they are not right testing, and noticed that cite{T2} proved consistency with ZFC of the statement {lq}each right testing ring is right perfect{ q} (the proof used Shelah's uniformization). Here, we prove the complementing consistency result: the existence of a right testing, but not right perfect ring is also consistent with ZFC (our proof uses Jensen-functions). Thus the answer to the Faith's question above is undecidable in ZFC. We also provide examples of non-right perfect rings such that the Dual Baer Criterion holds for {lq}small{ q} modules (where {lq}small{ q} means countably generated, or leq2aleph0-presented of projective dimension leq1).


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10465




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (7)





This page was built for publication: Faith's problem on \(R\)-projectivity is undecidable

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4644435)