The reliability of statistical functions in four software packages freely used in numerical computation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:464755
Recommendations
- A comparative study of the reliability of nine statistical software packages
- On the examination of the reliability of statistical software for estimating regression models with discrete dependent variables
- How accurate are the extremely small \(P\)-values used in genomic research: an evaluation of numerical libraries
- Assessing the reliability of web-based statistical software
- Using R for numerical analysis in science and engineering
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 47593 (Why is no real title available?)
- A comparative study of the reliability of nine statistical software packages
- Mersenne twister
- On the accuracy of statistical distributions in Microsoft Excel 2003
- On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2000 and Excel XP.
- On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2003
- On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2007
- On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 97.
- Statistical functions and procedures in IDL 5.6 and 6.0
- The accuracy of \textit{Mathematica 4} as a statistical package
- The accuracy of statistical distributions in Microsoft\(^{\circledR}\) Excel 2007
Cited in
(3)
Describes a project that uses
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: The reliability of statistical functions in four software packages freely used in numerical computation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q464755)
