How accurate are the extremely small P-values used in genomic research: an evaluation of numerical libraries
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:961658)
How accurate are the extremely small \(P\)-values used in genomic research: an evaluation of numerical libraries
How accurate are the extremely small \(P\)-values used in genomic research: an evaluation of numerical libraries
Recommendations
- Evaluating the accuracy of small \(p\)-values in genetic association studies using Edgeworth expansions
- The reliability of statistical functions in four software packages freely used in numerical computation
- The accuracy of statistical distributions in Microsoft\(^{\circledR}\) Excel 2007
- Implementation of Kolmogorov–SmirnovP-value computation in Visual Basic®: implication for Microsoft Excel® library function
- Permutation \(p\)-values should never be zero: calculating exact \(p\)-values when permutations are randomly drawn
Cites work
- A comparative study of the reliability of nine statistical software packages
- A remarkable example of catastrophic cancellation unraveled
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 846277 (Why is no real title available?)
- On the accuracy of statistical distributions in Microsoft Excel 2003
- The accuracy of \textit{Mathematica 4} as a statistical package
Cited in
(4)- Accurate and flexible power calculations on the spot: applications to genomic research
- The reliability of statistical functions in four software packages freely used in numerical computation
- Significant motifs in time series
- Accurate and fast small \(p\)-value estimation for permutation tests in high-throughput genomic data analysis with the cross-entropy method
Describes a project that uses
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: How accurate are the extremely small \(P\)-values used in genomic research: an evaluation of numerical libraries
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q961658)
