Dynamical charged N -body equilibrium in circular dilaton gravity

DOI10.1088/0264-9381/21/24/008MaRDI QIDQ4660902zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors R. Kerner, Robert B. Mann

Publication date 4 April 2005

Published in Classical and Quantum Gravity (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0410059

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Relativistic gravitational theories other than Einstein's, including asymmetric field theories (83D05)

Abstract: We extend the problem of $(1+1)$ circular dilaton gravity to include charged particles. We examine the two (charged) particle case in detail and find an exact equilibrium solution. We then extend this to $N-$particles and obtain a solution for this case as well. This class of solutions corresponds to $N$-particles of the same mass, spaced evenly around the circle with charges chosen so that the electric field satisfies $E^2=$constant. We discuss the relation of these solutions to the previous uncharged equilibrium solutions and examine the behavior when the number of particles is large. We comment on the challenges in further generalizing the solutions we obtain.

Recommendations

• Dynamical N -body equilibrium in circular dilaton gravity
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2013217
• On the equilibrium of charged masses in general relativity: the electrostatic case
• Exact solutions to the motion of two charged particles in lineal gravity
• Exact charged two-body motion and the static balance condition in lineal gravity

Cited in

(4)

• Exact solutions to the motion of two charged particles in lineal gravity
• Dynamical N -body equilibrium in circular dilaton gravity
• General dynamical equations for Dingle's space-times filled with a charged non-perfect fluid
• Interparticle potential up to next-to-leading order for gravitational, electrical, and dilatonic forces

This page was built for publication: Dynamical charged N -body equilibrium in circular dilaton gravity

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4660902)