Comparisons of Predictive Values of Binary Medical Diagnostic Tests for Paired Designs
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4667448
Recommendations
- Global hypothesis test to simultaneously compare the predictive values of two binary diagnostic tests in paired designs: a simulation study
- The effect of verification bias on the comparison of predictive values of two binary diagnostic tests
- Comparing Two Diagnostic Tests against the Same "Gold Standard" in the Same Sample
- Comparing two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias
- Comparison of the accuracy of multiple binary tests in the presence of partial disease verification
Cites work
Cited in
(29)- Minimum clinically important difference in medical studies
- The Predictive Value of Simple Rules for Combining Two Diagnostic Tests
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7498908 (Why is no real title available?)
- The effect of verification bias on the comparison of predictive values of two binary diagnostic tests
- Comparing multiple sensitivities and specificities with different diagnostic criteria: applications to sexual abuse and sexual health research
- Testing equality between two diagnostic procedures in paired-sample ordinal data
- Robustness of design for the testing of lack of fit and for estimation in binary response models
- Analyzing paired diagnostic studies by estimating the expected benefit
- Comparison of the predictive values of multiple binary diagnostic tests in the presence of ignorable missing data
- Quantifying and comparing the predictive accuracy of continuous prognostic factors for binary outcomes
- Group sequential comparison of positive predictive value curves for correlated biomarker data
- Binary regression: Total gain in positive and negative predictive values
- A general caxedorical data memddology for evaluating medical diagnostic tests
- Weighted generalized score test for comparing predictive values in the presence of verification bias
- Confidence bounds for the sensitivity lack of a less specific diagnostic test, without gold standard
- Adaptive Weighted Learning for Unbalanced Multicategory Classification
- Computational methods for comparing two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification of disease
- Comparing two diagnostic tests when two tests are applied to same patients and test scores are given in categories
- Comparing accuracy in an unpaired post-market device study with incomplete disease assessment
- Sequential designs for repeated-measures experiments
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6164636 (Why is no real title available?)
- Computational methods to simultaneously compare the predictive values of two diagnostic tests with missing data: EM-SEM algorithms and multiple imputation
- A combined superiority and non-inferiority procedure for comparing predictive values of two diagnostic tests
- Nonparametric predictive comparison of two diagnostic tests based on total numbers of correctly diagnosed individuals
- Multiple McNemar tests
- Global hypothesis test to simultaneously compare the predictive values of two binary diagnostic tests in paired designs: a simulation study
- Asymptotic hypothesis test to simultaneously compare the weighted kappa coefficients of multiple binary diagnostic tests in the presence of ignorable missing data
- A revisit to Bennett’s goodness-of-fit statistic for comparing two predictive values
- Borrowing information across populations in estimating positive and negative predictive values
This page was built for publication: Comparisons of Predictive Values of Binary Medical Diagnostic Tests for Paired Designs
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4667448)
