An improved explicit bound on \(| \zeta(\frac{1}{2} + i t) |\)

From MaRDI portal
Publication:472883

DOI10.1016/j.jnt.2014.08.019zbMath1382.11059OpenAlexW1744665950MaRDI QIDQ472883

David J. Platt, Timothy S. Trudgian

Publication date: 20 November 2014

Published in: Journal of Number Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2014.08.019




Related Items (24)

An explicit van der Corput estimate for \(\zeta(1/2+it)\)Improvements to Turing's method. IIExplicit \(L^2\) bounds for the Riemann \(\zeta\) functionOscillations in the Goldbach conjectureThe mean square of the error term in the prime number theoremAn explicit upper bound for \(|\zeta (1 + i t)|\)Improved explicit bounds for some functions of prime numbersExplicit interval estimates for prime numbersCounting zeros of the Riemann zeta functionLehmer pairs and derivatives of Hardy's \(Z\)-functionSharper bounds for the Chebyshev function \(\psi(x)\)Estimates for \(L\)-functions in the critical strip under GRH with effective applicationsExplicit zero density estimate for the Riemann zeta-function near the critical lineExplicit zero-free regions for the Riemann zeta-functionCorrigendum to ‘Explicit interval estimates for prime numbers’An improved explicit estimate for \(\zeta(1/2 + it)\)Explicit bounds on \(\zeta (s)\) in the critical strip and a zero-free regionIsolating some non-trivial zeros of zetaOn explicit estimates for \(S(t)\), \(S_1(t)\), and \(\zeta ( 1 / 2 + \operatorname{i} t )\) under the Riemann hypothesisExplicit bounds on the logarithmic derivative and the reciprocal of the Riemann zeta-functionAn explicit bound for the number of partitions into rootsSign changes in the prime number theoremThe Riemann hypothesis is true up to 3·1012A generalization of the Riemann-Siegel formula



Cites Work


This page was built for publication: An improved explicit bound on \(| \zeta(\frac{1}{2} + i t) |\)