Tests for mean equality that do not require homogeneity of variances: do they really Work?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4784251
DOI10.1080/03610910008813644zbMath1100.62514OpenAlexW1988324784MaRDI QIDQ4784251
Rand R. Wilcox, Jason Taylor, Rhonda K. Kowalchuk, H. J. Keselman
Publication date: 10 December 2002
Published in: Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610910008813644
Related Items (3)
Theoretical considerations when simulating data from the g‐and‐h family of distributions ⋮ Comparison of several means: a fiducial based approach ⋮ Heterogeneity of variance and biased hypothesis tests
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Robust nonorthogonal analyses revisited: An update based on trimmed means
- A one-way random effects model for trimmed means
- Confidence Interval Robustness with Long-Tailed Symmetric Distributions
- Exact Analysis of Variance with Unequal Variances: Test Procedures and Tables
- Size performance of some tests in one-way anova
- Single-stage analysis of variance under heteroscedasticity
- The 'improved' brown and forsythe test for mean equality: some things can't be fixed
- ANOVA: The practical importance of heteroscedastic methods, using trimmed means versus means, and designing simulation studies
- Some Results on the Tukey‐Mclaughlin and Yuen Methods for Trimmed Means when Distributions are Skewed
- The Small Sample Behavior of Some Statistics Which Test the Equality of Several Means
- THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TWO MEANS WHEN THE POPULATION VARIANCES ARE UNEQUAL
This page was built for publication: Tests for mean equality that do not require homogeneity of variances: do they really Work?
