Monitoring Pairwise Comparisons in Multi-Armed Clinical Trials
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4842830
DOI10.2307/2533376zbMath0822.62065WikidataQ52376256 ScholiaQ52376256MaRDI QIDQ4842830
Michael A. Proschan, Dean A. Follmann, Nancy L. Geller
Publication date: 18 October 1995
Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2533376
pairwise comparisons; Bonferroni inequality; log-rank test; multiple comparison procedure; group sequential monitoring; sequentially rejective procedure; use function; Type I error rate; multi-armed clinical trials
62P10: Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis
62L05: Sequential statistical design
62L10: Sequential statistical analysis
62J15: Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing
Related Items
Design and monitoring of multi‐arm multi‐stage clinical trials, Closed Testing Procedures for Group Sequential Clinical Trials with Multiple Endpoints, Confidence intervals for confirmatory adaptive two‐stage designs with treatment selection, Sample size re-estimation for confirmatory two-stage flexible multi-arm trial with normal outcomes, Sequential procedures for comparing several normal means, The Influence of Biostatistics at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Sample size optimization and initial allocation of the significance levels in group sequential trials with multiple endpoints, A unified framework for weighted parametric group sequential design, Group-sequential response-adaptive designs for multi-armed trials, An O'Brien-Fleming sequential trial for comparing three treatments, Basic concepts of group sequential and adaptive group sequential test procedures, Comparison of design strategies for a three-arm clinical trial with time-to-event endpoint: Power, time-to-analysis, and operational aspects, Sequential Methods in Multi-Arm Clinical Trials, Monitoring Clinical Trials with Multiple Arms, Simple Sequential Boundaries for Treatment Selection in Multi‐Armed Randomized Clinical Trials with a Control
