Estimating the number of genes that are differentially expressed in both of two independent experiments

DOI10.1007/S13253-012-0108-8MaRDI QIDQ484707zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Megan Orr, Peng Liu, Dan Nettleton

Publication date 7 January 2015

Published in Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-012-0108-8

zbMATH Keywords

\(\lambda\)-estimatorfalse discovery ratemicroarray data analysismultiple testing

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to environmental and related topics (62P12)

Recommendations

• A statistical method for estimating the proportion of differentially expressed genes
• A robust sequential Bayesian method for identification of differentially expressed genes
• Identifying differentially expressed genes in unreplicated multiple-treatment microarray timecourse experiments
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1750180
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1750184

Cites work

• A Direct Approach to False Discovery Rates
• A stochastic process approach to false discovery control.
• Estimating the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses, with application to DNA Microarray Data
• Linear Models and Empirical Bayes Methods for Assessing Differential Expression in Microarray Experiments
• Statistical significance for genomewide studies
• Strong Control, Conservative Point Estimation and Simultaneous Conservative Consistency of False Discovery Rates: A Unified Approach

This page was built for publication: Estimating the number of genes that are differentially expressed in both of two independent experiments

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q484707)