Rank disagreement: A comparison of multi‐criteria methodologies

DOI10.1002/MCDA.4020040102MaRDI QIDQ4860740zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Dennis M. Buede, Daniel T. Maxwell

Publication date 30 May 1996

Published in Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.4020040102

zbMATH Keywords

rank reversalsimulation experimentsfuzzy algorithmmulticriteria decision support techniques

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Decision theory (91B06)

Recommendations

• A Comment on ‘Rank Disagreement: A Comparison of Multi-Criteria Methodologies’
• Rank disequilibrium in multiple-criteria evaluation schemes
• Comparison of multi-criteria decision methods through a ranking stability index
• A ranking method for multiple-criteria decision-making
• Comparing ranking methods: complete RCI preference and multiplicative preference relations
• Evaluation of ranking accuracy in multi-criteria decisions
• An improved method for ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysis
• Ordinal ranking methods for multicriterion decision making
• Measuring congruence of ranking results applying particular MCDM methods
• Theoretical elements of comparison among ordinal discrete multicriteria methods

Cited in

(13)

• Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes
• Ingenious solution for the rank reversal problem of TOPSIS method
• Theoretical elements of comparison among ordinal discrete multicriteria methods
• Measuring congruence of ranking results applying particular MCDM methods
• Parallel and comparative use of three multicriteria decision support methods in an environmental portfolio problem
• Comparison of multi-criteria decision methods through a ranking stability index
• Validation examples of the analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1287780 (Why is no real title available?)
• A comparative study of multiattribute decision making methodologies
• On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the analytic hierarchy process
• Decision-makers' behavioral characteristics and multiple criteria decision aiding. Impact of decision-making style and experience on methods' use, evaluation, and recommendation
• Towards reconciling outranking and value measurement practice
• Two new cases of rank reversals when the AHP and some of its additive variants are used that do not occur with the multiplicative AHP

This page was built for publication: Rank disagreement: A comparison of multi‐criteria methodologies

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4860740)