A Comment on ‘Rank Disagreement: A Comparison of Multi-Criteria Methodologies’

DOI10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199707)6:4%3C197::AID-MCDA137%3E3.0.CO;2-6zbMATH Open0899.90119OpenAlexW2049290024MaRDI QIDQ4368588FDOQ4368588

Authors: Bertram Schoner, Eng Ung Choo, William C. Wedley 

Publication date: 4 December 1997

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1360(199707)6:4%3C197::aid-mcda137%3E3.0.co;2-6

Recommendations

• Rank disagreement: A comparison of multi‐criteria methodologies
• Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods
• On multiplicative priority rating methods for the AHP

zbMATH Keywords

multicriteria decision makinganalytic hierarchy processrank reversalmultiattribute value theorylarge-scale simulation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Decision theory (91B06) Individual preferences (91B08)

Cited In (4)

• Correcting illegitimate rank reversals: proper adjustment of criteria weights prevent alleged AHP intransitivity
• On rank reversal in decision analysis
• Rank preserved aggregation rules and application to reliability allocation
• Rank disagreement: A comparison of multi‐criteria methodologies

This page was built for publication: A Comment on ‘Rank Disagreement: A Comparison of Multi-Criteria Methodologies’

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4368588)