Correcting illegitimate rank reversals: proper adjustment of criteria weights prevent alleged AHP intransitivity

DOI10.1002/MCDA.431MaRDI QIDQ3074968zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors William C. Wedley, Diederik J. D. Wijnmalen

Publication date 10 February 2011

Published in Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.431

zbMATH Keywords

commensurabilityanalytic hierarchy process (AHP)rank reversalindependence axiomweight adjustment

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Recommendations

• Some Comments on Saaty's AHP
• Ahp Rank Reversal, Normalization And Aggregation Rules
• Another potential shortcoming of AHP
• Avoiding rank reversal in AHP decision-support models
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1530349

Cites work

• A Comment on ‘Rank Disagreement: A Comparison of Multi-Criteria Methodologies’
• Multi-criteria decision making methods. A comparative study
• Two new cases of rank reversals when the AHP and some of its additive variants are used that do not occur with the multiplicative AHP

Cited in

(7)

• Ahp Rank Reversal, Normalization And Aggregation Rules
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1530349 (Why is no real title available?)
• Normalisation and rank reversals in the additive analytic hierarchy process: a new analysis
• Avoiding rank reversal in AHP decision-support models
• A revisit to wash criteria in analytic hierarchy process
• Two new cases of rank reversals when the AHP and some of its additive variants are used that do not occur with the multiplicative AHP
• Clustering, dependence and ratio scales in AHP: Rank reversals and incorrect priorities with a single criterion

This page was built for publication: Correcting illegitimate rank reversals: proper adjustment of criteria weights prevent alleged AHP intransitivity

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3074968)