Clustering, dependence and ratio scales in AHP: Rank reversals and incorrect priorities with a single criterion

DOI10.1002/MCDA.4020020304zbMATH Open0839.90006OpenAlexW2022018566MaRDI QIDQ4863874FDOQ4863874

Authors: William C. Wedley, Bertram Schoner, Eng Ung Choo 

Publication date: 28 January 1996

Published in: Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.4020020304

Recommendations

• Ahp Rank Reversal, Normalization And Aggregation Rules
• Correcting illegitimate rank reversals: proper adjustment of criteria weights prevent alleged AHP intransitivity
• Some Comments on Saaty's AHP
• Another potential shortcoming of AHP
• On rank reversal in decision analysis

zbMATH Keywords

analytic hierarchy processrank reversalsratio-scaled multiple-criteria decision making

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06)

Cited In (7)

• Ingenious solution for the rank reversal problem of TOPSIS method
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Multicriteria decision analysis: Some thoughts based on the tutorial and discussion sessions of the ESIGMA meetings
• A fuzzy multiple-attribute decision making model to evaluate new product pricing strategies
• Two new cases of rank reversals when the AHP and some of its additive variants are used that do not occur with the multiplicative AHP
• Analysis of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (BOCR) with the AHP-ANP: a critical validation

This page was built for publication: Clustering, dependence and ratio scales in AHP: Rank reversals and incorrect priorities with a single criterion

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4863874)