Counting-based impossibility proofs for renaming and set agreement
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4909423
Recommendations
- Renaming is weaker than set agreement but for perfect renaming: a map of sub-consensus tasks
- Subconsensus Tasks: Renaming Is Weaker Than Set Agreement
- From Renaming to Set Agreement
- Brief announcement: There are plenty of tasks weaker than perfect renaming and stronger than set agreement
- From adaptive renaming to set agreement
Cited in
(16)- A non-topological proof for the impossibility of \(k\)-set agreement
- Combinatorial Topology of the Standard Chromatic Subdivision and Weak Symmetry Breaking for Six Processes
- Revisionist simulations: a new approach to proving space lower bounds
- Weak symmetry breaking and abstract simplex paths
- Subconsensus Tasks: Renaming Is Weaker Than Set Agreement
- Structure theory of flip graphs with applications to weak symmetry breaking
- Set agreement and renaming in the presence of contention-related crash failures
- An equivariance theorem with applications to renaming
- New combinatorial topology bounds for renaming: the lower bound
- Brief announcement: There are plenty of tasks weaker than perfect renaming and stronger than set agreement
- Renaming is weaker than set agreement but for perfect renaming: a map of sub-consensus tasks
- Generalized symmetry breaking tasks and nondeterminism in concurrent objects
- Bounds on the step and namespace complexity of renaming
- Why extension-based proofs fail
- Why Extension-Based Proofs Fail
- A topological view of partitioning arguments: reducing \(k\)-set agreement to consensus
This page was built for publication: Counting-based impossibility proofs for renaming and set agreement
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4909423)