A note on using regression models to analyze randomized trials: asymptotically valid hypothesis tests despite incorrectly specified models
DOI10.1111/J.1541-0420.2012.01798.XzbMATH Open1270.62098OpenAlexW2334869311WikidataQ43920726 ScholiaQ43920726MaRDI QIDQ4919604FDOQ4919604
Authors: Jane Paik Kim 
Publication date: 14 May 2013
Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01798.x
Recommendations
- Using Regression Models to Analyze Randomized Trials: Asymptotically Valid Hypothesis Tests Despite Incorrectly Specified Models
- Rejoinder to ``A note on using regression models to analyze randomized trials: asymptotically valid hypothesis tests despite incorrectly specified models
- Effects of model misspecification on tests of no randomized treatment effect arising from Cox's proportional hazards model
- Some properties of misspecified additive hazards models
- A note on misspecified transformation models
likelihoodhypothesis testingmodel misspecificationCox proportional hazards modelparametric proportional hazards model
Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Linear regression; mixed models (62J05) Generalized linear models (logistic models) (62J12)
Cites Work
- Rank-based inference for the accelerated failure time model
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models
- Cox's regression model for counting processes: A large sample study
- The Robust Inference for the Cox Proportional Hazards Model
- Semiparametric analysis of transformation models with censored data
- Robust inference for univariate proportional hazards frailty regression models
- Misspecified proportional hazard models
- Using Regression Models to Analyze Randomized Trials: Asymptotically Valid Hypothesis Tests Despite Incorrectly Specified Models
- Effects of model misspecification on tests of no randomized treatment effect arising from Cox's proportional hazards model
- Robust covariate-adjusted logrank tests
- Asymptotic distribution theory for Cox-type regression models with general relative risk form
- Some new estimators for Cox regression
- A Jackknife Estimator of Variance for Cox Regression for Correlated Survival Data
- Comparing nonnested Cox models
- Bias correction for score tests arising from misspecified proportional hazards regression models
Cited In (5)
- On logistic regression with right censored data, with or without competing risks, and its use for estimating treatment effects
- Tests for no treatment effect in randomized clinical trials
- Using Regression Models to Analyze Randomized Trials: Asymptotically Valid Hypothesis Tests Despite Incorrectly Specified Models
- Effects of model misspecification on tests of no randomized treatment effect arising from Cox's proportional hazards model
- Rejoinder to ``A note on using regression models to analyze randomized trials: asymptotically valid hypothesis tests despite incorrectly specified models
This page was built for publication: A note on using regression models to analyze randomized trials: asymptotically valid hypothesis tests despite incorrectly specified models
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4919604)
