Using Regression Models to Analyze Randomized Trials: Asymptotically Valid Hypothesis Tests Despite Incorrectly Specified Models
DOI10.1111/J.1541-0420.2008.01177.XzbMATH Open1172.62058OpenAlexW2171755107WikidataQ37356269 ScholiaQ37356269MaRDI QIDQ3183243FDOQ3183243
Authors: Michael Rosenblum, Mark J. Van der Laan 
Publication date: 19 October 2009
Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://biostats.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1222&context=ucbbiostat
Recommendations
- A note on using regression models to analyze randomized trials: asymptotically valid hypothesis tests despite incorrectly specified models
- Rejoinder to ``A note on using regression models to analyze randomized trials: asymptotically valid hypothesis tests despite incorrectly specified models
- Robustness of ANCOVA in randomized trials with unequal randomization
- Effects of model misspecification on tests of no randomized treatment effect arising from Cox's proportional hazards model
- Validity of tests under covariate-adaptive biased coin randomization and generalized linear models
Linear regression; mixed models (62J05) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Generalized linear models (logistic models) (62J12) Testing in survival analysis and censored data (62N03)
Cites Work
- Asymptotic Statistics
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect
- Covariance adjustment in radomized experiments and observational studies
- Improving Efficiency of Inferences in Randomized Clinical Trials Using Auxiliary Covariates
- On regression adjustments to experimental data
- Optimal Structural Nested Models for Optimal Sequential Decisions
- Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests
- Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials using structural nested mean models
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Some Surprising Results about Covariate Adjustment in Logistic Regression Models
- From association to causation via regression
- Statistical Models: Theory and Practice
- Randomization does not justify logistic regression
Cited In (11)
- \(Q\)- and \(A\)-learning methods for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes
- On model selection and model misspecification in causal inference
- A broad symmetry criterion for nonparametric validity of parametrically based tests in randomized trials
- Performing Legitimate Parametric Regression Analysis without Knowing the True Underlying Random Mechanisms
- Estimating Malaria Vaccine Efficacy in the Absence of a Gold Standard Case Definition: Mendelian Factorial Design
- Interaction analysis under misspecification of main effects: some common mistakes and simple solutions
- Rejoinder to “A Note on Using Regression Models to Analyze Randomized Trials: Asymptotically Valid Hypothesis Tests Despite Incorrectly Specified Models”
- Inverse probability of treatment weighting with generalized linear outcome models for doubly robust estimation
- Randomization does not justify logistic regression
- Estimators for the value of the optimal dynamic treatment rule with application to criminal justice interventions
- A Note on Using Regression Models to Analyze Randomized Trials: Asymptotically Valid Hypothesis Tests Despite Incorrectly Specified Models
This page was built for publication: Using Regression Models to Analyze Randomized Trials: Asymptotically Valid Hypothesis Tests Despite Incorrectly Specified Models
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3183243)
