Using Regression Models to Analyze Randomized Trials: Asymptotically Valid Hypothesis Tests Despite Incorrectly Specified Models
DOI10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01177.xzbMath1172.62058OpenAlexW2171755107WikidataQ37356269 ScholiaQ37356269MaRDI QIDQ3183243
Publication date: 19 October 2009
Published in: Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://biostats.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1222&context=ucbbiostat
Linear regression; mixed models (62J05) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Generalized linear models (logistic models) (62J12) Testing in survival analysis and censored data (62N03)
Related Items (7)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- From association to causation via regression
- Randomization does not justify logistic regression
- Covariance adjustment in radomized experiments and observational studies
- On regression adjustments to experimental data
- Improving Efficiency of Inferences in Randomized Clinical Trials Using Auxiliary Covariates
- Some Surprising Results about Covariate Adjustment in Logistic Regression Models
- Asymptotic Statistics
- A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect
- Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials using structural nested mean models
- Optimal Structural Nested Models for Optimal Sequential Decisions
- Statistical Models: Theory and Practice
- Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests
This page was built for publication: Using Regression Models to Analyze Randomized Trials: Asymptotically Valid Hypothesis Tests Despite Incorrectly Specified Models