Using Regression Models to Analyze Randomized Trials: Asymptotically Valid Hypothesis Tests Despite Incorrectly Specified Models
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:3183243)
Recommendations
- A note on using regression models to analyze randomized trials: asymptotically valid hypothesis tests despite incorrectly specified models
- Rejoinder to ``A note on using regression models to analyze randomized trials: asymptotically valid hypothesis tests despite incorrectly specified models
- Robustness of ANCOVA in randomized trials with unequal randomization
- Effects of model misspecification on tests of no randomized treatment effect arising from Cox's proportional hazards model
- Validity of tests under covariate-adaptive biased coin randomization and generalized linear models
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3336465 (Why is no real title available?)
- A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect
- Asymptotic Statistics
- Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials using structural nested mean models
- Covariance adjustment in radomized experiments and observational studies
- From association to causation via regression
- Improving Efficiency of Inferences in Randomized Clinical Trials Using Auxiliary Covariates
- On regression adjustments to experimental data
- Optimal Structural Nested Models for Optimal Sequential Decisions
- Randomization does not justify logistic regression
- Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests
- Some Surprising Results about Covariate Adjustment in Logistic Regression Models
- Statistical Models: Theory and Practice
- Statistics
Cited in
(16)- Q- and A-learning methods for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes
- On model selection and model misspecification in causal inference
- A broad symmetry criterion for nonparametric validity of parametrically based tests in randomized trials
- Performing Legitimate Parametric Regression Analysis without Knowing the True Underlying Random Mechanisms
- A note on using regression models to analyze randomized trials: asymptotically valid hypothesis tests despite incorrectly specified models
- Boosting the precision of mediation analyses of randomised experiments through covariate adjustment
- Estimating Malaria Vaccine Efficacy in the Absence of a Gold Standard Case Definition: Mendelian Factorial Design
- Estimands and cumulative incidence function regression in clinical trials: some new results on interpretability and robustness
- Interaction analysis under misspecification of main effects: some common mistakes and simple solutions
- Effects among the affected
- Inverse probability of treatment weighting with generalized linear outcome models for doubly robust estimation
- Randomization does not justify logistic regression
- Estimators for the value of the optimal dynamic treatment rule with application to criminal justice interventions
- On regression adjustment for the propensity score
- Increasing the power of the Mann-Whitney test in randomized experiments through flexible covariate adjustment
- Rejoinder to ``A note on using regression models to analyze randomized trials: asymptotically valid hypothesis tests despite incorrectly specified models
This page was built for publication: Using Regression Models to Analyze Randomized Trials: Asymptotically Valid Hypothesis Tests Despite Incorrectly Specified Models
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3183243)
