Using Regression Models to Analyze Randomized Trials: Asymptotically Valid Hypothesis Tests Despite Incorrectly Specified Models

DOI10.1111/J.1541-0420.2008.01177.XMaRDI QIDQ3183243zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Michael Rosenblum, Mark J. Van der Laan

Publication date 19 October 2009

Published in Biometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://biostats.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1222&context=ucbbiostat

zbMATH Keywords

generalized linear modelregressioncausal effectsmisspecified modelrobust methodsrandomized trial

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Linear regression; mixed models (62J05) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Generalized linear models (logistic models) (62J12) Testing in survival analysis and censored data (62N03)

Recommendations

• A note on using regression models to analyze randomized trials: asymptotically valid hypothesis tests despite incorrectly specified models
• Rejoinder to ``A note on using regression models to analyze randomized trials: asymptotically valid hypothesis tests despite incorrectly specified models
• Robustness of ANCOVA in randomized trials with unequal randomization
• Effects of model misspecification on tests of no randomized treatment effect arising from Cox's proportional hazards model
• Validity of tests under covariate-adaptive biased coin randomization and generalized linear models

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3336465 (Why is no real title available?)
• A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect
• Asymptotic Statistics
• Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials using structural nested mean models
• Covariance adjustment in radomized experiments and observational studies
• From association to causation via regression
• Improving Efficiency of Inferences in Randomized Clinical Trials Using Auxiliary Covariates
• On regression adjustments to experimental data
• Optimal Structural Nested Models for Optimal Sequential Decisions
• Randomization does not justify logistic regression
• Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests
• Some Surprising Results about Covariate Adjustment in Logistic Regression Models
• Statistical Models: Theory and Practice
• Statistics

Cited in

(11)

• On model selection and model misspecification in causal inference
• Estimating Malaria Vaccine Efficacy in the Absence of a Gold Standard Case Definition: Mendelian Factorial Design
• Randomization does not justify logistic regression
• A broad symmetry criterion for nonparametric validity of parametrically based tests in randomized trials
• Interaction analysis under misspecification of main effects: some common mistakes and simple solutions
• \(Q\)- and \(A\)-learning methods for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes
• A note on using regression models to analyze randomized trials: asymptotically valid hypothesis tests despite incorrectly specified models
• Estimators for the value of the optimal dynamic treatment rule with application to criminal justice interventions
• Inverse probability of treatment weighting with generalized linear outcome models for doubly robust estimation
• Performing Legitimate Parametric Regression Analysis without Knowing the True Underlying Random Mechanisms
• Rejoinder to ``A note on using regression models to analyze randomized trials: asymptotically valid hypothesis tests despite incorrectly specified models

This page was built for publication: Using Regression Models to Analyze Randomized Trials: Asymptotically Valid Hypothesis Tests Despite Incorrectly Specified Models

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3183243)