Psychological tests in measurement theory

MaRDI QIDQ4929883zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Kohshi Kikuchi, Shiro Ishikawa

Publication date 24 September 2010

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.2664, http://pphmj.com/abstract/5006.htm

zbMATH Keywords

Occam's razormeasurement theoryBell's inequalitypsychological testsplit-half methodquantitative language

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Measures of association (correlation, canonical correlation, etc.) (62H20) Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15)

Abstract: Recently, we proposed measurement theory ( or. quantum language) as a linguistic turn of quantum mechanics (with the Copenhagen interpretation). This theory has a great power of scientific descriptions. In fact, we have continued asserting that even statistics can be described in terms of measurement theory. Thus, we believe that quantum language is future statistics (i.e., statistics will develop into quantum language). However, now we think that our arguments were too abstract and philosophical, that is, we should have presented concrete examples much more. Thus, in this paper, we show that the calculation of Kalman filter is more understandable in terms of quantum language than in terms of usual statistics. For this, we devote ourselves to statistical measurement theory, in which the Bertrand paradox is discussed.

Recommendations

• Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests
• On the reliability of the extreme score
• Internal consistency of tests: Analyses old and new
• 4 Reliability Coefficients and Generalizability Theory
• Extensions of reliability theory

Cited in

(3)

• Extensions of reliability theory
• Assessment structures in psychological testing
• Multiple-choice tests: construction of items

This page was built for publication: Psychological tests in measurement theory

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4929883)