Quantum mechanics and elements of reality inferred from joint measurements
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4950263
Abstract: The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument on quantum mechanics incompleteness is formulated in terms of elements of reality inferred from joint (as opposed to alternative) measurements, in two examples involving entangled states of three spin-1/2 particles. The same states allow us to obtain proofs of the incompatibility between quantum mechanics and elements of reality.
Recommendations
- Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered correct?
- EPR: how subtle is the Lord and how is the Lord subtle?
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 958613
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3987248
- Simultaneous elements of reality for incompatible properties by exploiting locality
Cited in
(8)- Partial measurements and the realization of quantum-mechanical counterfactuals
- Einstein's boxes: incompleteness of quantum mechanics without a separation principle
- Simultaneous elements of reality for incompatible properties by exploiting locality
- A realistic theory of quantum measurement
- Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered correct?
- The inadequacy of effective incoherence interpretations of quantum theory, as demonstrated by analysis of EPR measurements.
- Coexistence and joint measurability in quantum mechanics
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5212681 (Why is no real title available?)
This page was built for publication: Quantum mechanics and elements of reality inferred from joint measurements
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4950263)