Quantum mechanics and elements of reality inferred from joint measurements
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4950263
DOI10.1088/0305-4470/30/2/032zbMATH Open0960.81003arXivquant-ph/9709056OpenAlexW3105041419WikidataQ62116020 ScholiaQ62116020MaRDI QIDQ4950263FDOQ4950263
Authors: Adán Cabello, Guillermo García-Alcaine 
Publication date: 8 May 2000
Published in: Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument on quantum mechanics incompleteness is formulated in terms of elements of reality inferred from joint (as opposed to alternative) measurements, in two examples involving entangled states of three spin-1/2 particles. The same states allow us to obtain proofs of the incompatibility between quantum mechanics and elements of reality.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9709056
Recommendations
- Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered correct?
- EPR: how subtle is the Lord and how is the Lord subtle?
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 958613
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3987248
- Simultaneous elements of reality for incompatible properties by exploiting locality
Cited In (7)
- The inadequacy of effective incoherence interpretations of quantum theory, as demonstrated by analysis of EPR measurements.
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Coexistence and joint measurability in quantum mechanics
- Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered correct?
- Partial measurements and the realization of quantum-mechanical counterfactuals
- Simultaneous elements of reality for incompatible properties by exploiting locality
- A realistic theory of quantum measurement
This page was built for publication: Quantum mechanics and elements of reality inferred from joint measurements
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4950263)
