Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered correct?
DOI10.1007/S10701-010-9411-9zbMATH Open1192.81015OpenAlexW3158391042MaRDI QIDQ972637FDOQ972637
Authors: Gilles Brassard, André Allan Méthot 
Publication date: 21 May 2010
Published in: Foundations of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-010-9411-9
Recommendations
- CAN QUANTUM-MECHANICAL DESCRIPTION OF PHYSICAL REALITY BE CONSIDERED INCOMPLETE?
- EPR: how subtle is the Lord and how is the Lord subtle?
- Quantum mechanics and elements of reality inferred from joint measurements
- Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, Nathan Rosen. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Translated from the German by Anna Katharina Hudert and Sebastian Linden
- Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states
General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum coherence, entanglement, quantum correlations (81P40) Commutation relations and statistics as related to quantum mechanics (general) (81S05)
Cites Work
- Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
- Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?
- A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables. I
- CAN QUANTUM-MECHANICAL DESCRIPTION OF PHYSICAL REALITY BE CONSIDERED INCOMPLETE?
Cited In (6)
- Could ordinary quantum mechanics be just fine for all practical purposes?
- Completeness, supervenience and ontology
- Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Entanglement swapping, light cones and elements of reality
- CAN QUANTUM-MECHANICAL DESCRIPTION OF PHYSICAL REALITY BE CONSIDERED INCOMPLETE?
This page was built for publication: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered correct?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q972637)
