Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered correct?
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:972637)
Recommendations
- CAN QUANTUM-MECHANICAL DESCRIPTION OF PHYSICAL REALITY BE CONSIDERED INCOMPLETE?
- EPR: how subtle is the Lord and how is the Lord subtle?
- Quantum mechanics and elements of reality inferred from joint measurements
- Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, Nathan Rosen. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Translated from the German by Anna Katharina Hudert and Sebastian Linden
- Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states
Cites work
- A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables. I
- CAN QUANTUM-MECHANICAL DESCRIPTION OF PHYSICAL REALITY BE CONSIDERED INCOMPLETE?
- Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
- Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?
Cited in
(7)- Completeness, supervenience and ontology
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2154298 (Why is no real title available?)
- CAN QUANTUM-MECHANICAL DESCRIPTION OF PHYSICAL REALITY BE CONSIDERED INCOMPLETE?
- Quantum mechanics and elements of reality inferred from joint measurements
- Entanglement swapping, light cones and elements of reality
- Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states
- Could ordinary quantum mechanics be just fine for all practical purposes?
This page was built for publication: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered correct?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q972637)