Do We Need Mathematical Facts?

DOI10.1080/01445340.2013.828517zbMath1312.03013OpenAlexW1982312894WikidataQ57678806 ScholiaQ57678806MaRDI QIDQ4983363

Wojciech Krysztofiak

Publication date: 25 March 2015

Published in: History and Philosophy of Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2013.828517

zbMATH Keywords

truth-makersfine-graining factsmathematical factsslingshot argumentssoftening mathematical facts

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Related Items (1)

Hyper-slingshot. Is fact-arithmetic possible?

Cites Work

• Tarski's definition and truth-makers
• Shallow analysis and the slingshot argument
• Number of extensions of non-Fregean logics
• The slingshot argument and sentential identity
• Graded modalities. I
• Frege on truth and reference
• Graded modalities. II. (Canonical models)
• Causal slingshots
• Formalizing medieval logical theories. Suppositio, consequentiae and obligationes
• Ontology in the Tractatus of L. Wittgenstein
• The Extensionality Argument
• THE PURE LOGIC OF GROUND

This page was built for publication: Do We Need Mathematical Facts?