Shallow analysis and the slingshot argument

DOI10.1007/S10992-010-9131-9zbMATH Open1207.03008OpenAlexW2085609624MaRDI QIDQ600849FDOQ600849

Authors: Michael Baumgartner 

Publication date: 3 November 2010

Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://boris.unibe.ch/14455/1/10992_2010_Article_9131.pdf

Recommendations

• The slingshot argument and sentential identity
• Naive \textit{modus ponens}
• Causal slingshots
• Hyper-slingshot. Is fact-arithmetic possible?
• State-of-affairs semantics for positive free logic

zbMATH Keywords

logical formalizationfactual contextsshallow analysisslingshot argument

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Adequate formalization
• Logical forms. An introduction to philosophical logic.
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Collapsing arguments for facts and propositions
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Axiomatic set theory. With a historical introduction by Abraham A. Fraenkel

Cited In (4)

• Hyper-slingshot. Is fact-arithmetic possible?
• Causal slingshots
• The slingshot argument and sentential identity
• Do We Need Mathematical Facts?

This page was built for publication: Shallow analysis and the slingshot argument

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q600849)