Do We Need Mathematical Facts?

DOI10.1080/01445340.2013.828517MaRDI QIDQ4983363zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Wojciech Krysztofiak

Publication date 25 March 2015

Published in History and Philosophy of Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2013.828517

zbMATH Keywords

fine-graining factsmathematical factsslingshot argumentssoftening mathematical factstruth-makers

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• Does Mathematics Need Something other than Logic?
• Does mathematics need a philosophy?
• Does Mathematics Need Foundations?

Cites work

• Causal slingshots
• Formalizing medieval logical theories. Suppositio, consequentiae and obligationes
• Frege on truth and reference
• Graded modalities. I
• Graded modalities. II. (Canonical models)
• Number of extensions of non-Fregean logics
• Ontology in the Tractatus of L. Wittgenstein
• Shallow analysis and the slingshot argument
• Tarski's definition and truth-makers
• The Extensionality Argument
• THE PURE LOGIC OF GROUND
• The slingshot argument and sentential identity

Cited in

(3)

• Hyper-slingshot. Is fact-arithmetic possible?
• Mathematical facts in a physicalist ontology
• Setting the facts straight

This page was built for publication: Do We Need Mathematical Facts?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4983363)