Comparison of random-effects meta-analysis models for the relative risk in the case of rare events: a simulation study
From MaRDI portal
Publication:4998784
Recommendations
- Meta-Analysis for Rare Events As Binary Outcomes
- Meta-analysis of rare events under the assumption of a homogeneous treatment effect
- Meta-analysis of proportions of rare events -- a comparison of exact likelihood methods with robust variance estimation
- Meta-analysis of rare binary adverse event data
- Meta‐analysis of clinical trials with rare events
Cited in
(12)- Meta-analysis of two studies in the presence of heterogeneity with applications in rare diseases
- Random‐effects meta‐analysis models for the odds ratio in the case of rare events under different data‐generating models: A simulation study
- Measures of single arm outcome in meta‐analyses of rare events in the presence of competing risks
- Meta-analysis of rare events under the assumption of a homogeneous treatment effect
- Estimation of effect heterogeneity in rare events meta-analysis
- Frequentist performances of Bayesian prediction intervals for random‐effects meta‐analysis
- Meta‐analysis of clinical trials with rare events
- Estimating risk and rate ratio in rare events meta-analysis with the Mantel-Haenszel estimator and assessing heterogeneity
- Performance of the Peto odds ratio compared to the usual odds ratio estimator in the case of rare events
- Bivariate beta-binomial model using Gaussian copula for bivariate meta-analysis of two binary outcomes with low incidence
- Meta-analysis of rare binary adverse event data
- Meta-analysis of proportions of rare events -- a comparison of exact likelihood methods with robust variance estimation
This page was built for publication: Comparison of random-effects meta-analysis models for the relative risk in the case of rare events: a simulation study
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4998784)
