Meta-Analysis for Rare Events As Binary Outcomes
DOI10.1007/978-3-319-69416-0_3zbMATH Open1402.62268OpenAlexW2786414695WikidataQ62588999 ScholiaQ62588999MaRDI QIDQ4556964FDOQ4556964
Authors: Gaohong Dong 
Publication date: 28 November 2018
Published in: New Advances in Statistics and Data Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69416-0_3
Recommendations
- Meta-analysis of rare binary adverse event data
- Meta-analysis of rare events under the assumption of a homogeneous treatment effect
- Meta‐analysis of clinical trials with rare events
- Statistical methods for quantifying between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis with focus on rare binary events
- Estimation of effect heterogeneity in rare events meta-analysis
- Meta-analysis framework for exact inferences with application to the analysis of rare events
- Investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis of studies with rare events. Estimating the amount of heterogeneity
- Measures of single arm outcome in meta‐analyses of rare events in the presence of competing risks
- Meta-analysis of proportions of rare events -- a comparison of exact likelihood methods with robust variance estimation
- Random‐effects meta‐analysis models for the odds ratio in the case of rare events under different data‐generating models: A simulation study
meta-analysisparametric bootstrapregression modelPoisson modelrare eventMantel-Haenszel methodPeto odds ratiobeta-bionomial modelinverse-variance weighted methodzero-events
Nonparametric estimation (62G05) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)
Cites Work
- Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. (With comments and a rejoinder).
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Estimation of a Common Effect Parameter from Sparse Follow-Up Data
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments
- Estimators of the Mantel-Haenszel Variance Consistent in Both Sparse Data and Large-Strata Limiting Models
- STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS: VII. THE PRINCIPLE OF THE ARITHMETIC MEAN
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Exact and efficient inference procedure for meta-analysis and its application to the analysis of independent 2 x 2 tables with all available data but without artificial continuity correction
- Meta‐analysis of clinical trials with rare events
- Performance of the Peto odds ratio compared to the usual odds ratio estimator in the case of rare events
Cited In (14)
- Meta analysis of binary data with excessive zeros in two-arm trials
- Measures of single arm outcome in meta‐analyses of rare events in the presence of competing risks
- Meta-analysis of rare events under the assumption of a homogeneous treatment effect
- Statistical methods for quantifying between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis with focus on rare binary events
- Investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis of studies with rare events. Estimating the amount of heterogeneity
- Estimation of effect heterogeneity in rare events meta-analysis
- Meta‐analysis of clinical trials with rare events
- Performance of the Peto odds ratio compared to the usual odds ratio estimator in the case of rare events
- Meta-analysis of rare binary adverse event data
- Bivariate beta-binomial model using Gaussian copula for bivariate meta-analysis of two binary outcomes with low incidence
- Meta-analysis of proportions of rare events -- a comparison of exact likelihood methods with robust variance estimation
- Meta-analysis framework for exact inferences with application to the analysis of rare events
- Comparison of random-effects meta-analysis models for the relative risk in the case of rare events: a simulation study
- Meta-analysis of two studies in the presence of heterogeneity with applications in rare diseases
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Meta-Analysis for Rare Events As Binary Outcomes
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4556964)
