Pinning down versus density

From MaRDI portal
Publication:501845

DOI10.1007/S11856-016-1389-3zbMATH Open1360.54009arXiv1506.00206OpenAlexW2963127783MaRDI QIDQ501845FDOQ501845


Authors: István Juhász, Lajos Soukup, Zoltán Szentmiklóssy Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 10 January 2017

Published in: Israel Journal of Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The pinning down number pd(X) of a topological space X is the smallest cardinal kappa such that for any neighborhood assignment U:XoauX there is a set Ain[X]kappa with AcapU(x)eemptyset for all xinX. Clearly, c(X)lepd(X)led(X). Here we prove that the following statements are equivalent: (1) 2kappa<kappa+omega for each cardinal kappa; (2) d(X)=pd(X) for each Hausdorff space X; (3) d(X)=pd(X) for each 0-dimensional Hausdorff space X. This answers two questions of Banakh and Ravsky. The dispersion character Delta(X) of a space X is the smallest cardinality of a non-empty open subset of X. We also show that if pd(X)<d(X) then X has an open subspace Y with pd(Y)<d(Y) and |Y|=Delta(Y), moreover the following three statements are equiconsistent: (i) There is a singular cardinal lambda with pp(lambda)>lambda+, i.e. Shelah's Strong Hypothesis fails; (ii) there is a 0-dimensional Hausdorff space X such that |X|=Delta(X) is a regular cardinal and pd(X)<d(X); (iii) there is a topological space X such that |X|=Delta(X) is a regular cardinal and pd(X)<d(X). We also prove that d(X)=pd(X) for any locally compact Hausdorff space X; for every Hausdorff space X we have |X|le22pd(X) and pd(X)<d(X) implies Delta(X)<22pd(X); for every regular space X we have minDelta(X),,w(X)le2pd(X), and d(X)<2pd(X),, moreover pd(X)<d(X) implies ,Delta(X)<2pd(X).


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.00206




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (5)





This page was built for publication: Pinning down versus density

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q501845)