Pinning down versus density

DOI10.1007/S11856-016-1389-3MaRDI QIDQ501845zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors István Juhász, Lajos Soukup, Zoltán Szentmiklóssy

Publication date 10 January 2017

Published in Israel Journal of Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.00206, http://real.mtak.hu/44236/1/art3A10.10072Fs11856_016_1389_3_u.pdf

zbMATH Keywords

densityShelah's Strong Hypothesisdispersion characterforedensityneighbourhood assignmentpinning down number

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Consistency and independence results (03E35) Cardinality properties (cardinal functions and inequalities, discrete subsets) (54A25) Consistency and independence results in general topology (54A35) Ordinal and cardinal numbers (03E10)

Abstract: The pinning down number $pd(X)$ of a topological space $X$ is the smallest cardinal $kappa$ such that for any neighborhood assignment $U:Xoa{u}_X$ there is a set $Ain[X{]}^{k}appa$ with $AcapU(x)eemptyset$ for all $xinX$. Clearly, c$(X)lepd(X)led(X)$. Here we prove that the following statements are equivalent: (1) $2^{k}appa<kapp{a}^{+omega}$ for each cardinal $kappa$; (2) $d(X)=pd(X)$ for each Hausdorff space $X$; (3) $d(X)=pd(X)$ for each 0-dimensional Hausdorff space $X$. This answers two questions of Banakh and Ravsky. The dispersion character $Delta(X)$ of a space $X$ is the smallest cardinality of a non-empty open subset of $X$. We also show that if $pd(X)<d(X)$ then $X$ has an open subspace $Y$ with $pd(Y)<d(Y)$ and $|Y|=Delta(Y)$, moreover the following three statements are equiconsistent: (i) There is a singular cardinal $lambda$ with $pp(lambda)>lambd{a}^{+}$, i.e. Shelah's Strong Hypothesis fails; (ii) there is a 0-dimensional Hausdorff space $X$ such that $|X|=Delta(X)$ is a regular cardinal and $pd(X)<d(X)$; (iii) there is a topological space $X$ such that $|X|=Delta(X)$ is a regular cardinal and $pd(X)<d(X)$. We also prove that $$ $d(X)=pd(X)$ for any locally compact Hausdorff space $X$; $$ for every Hausdorff space $X$ we have $|X|le{2}^{2^{pd(X)}}$ and $pd(X)<d(X)$ implies $Delta(X)<2^{2^{pd(X)}}$; $$ for every regular space $X$ we have $minDelta(X),,w(X)le{2}^{pd(X)},$ and $d(X)<2^{pd(X)},,$ moreover $pd(X)<d(X)$ implies $,Delta(X)<2^{pd(X)}$.

Recommendations

• Dominating and pinning down pairs for topological spaces
• Between homeomorphism type and Tukey type
• Connected and/or topological group pd-examples
• \(\pi\) (X)\(=\delta (X)\) for compact X
• On topological spaces of singular density and minimal weight

Cites work

• Cardinal Arithmetic
• Cardinal arithmetic for skeptics
• Verbal covering properties of topological spaces

Cited in

(5)

• Connected and/or topological group pd-examples
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3887671 (Why is no real title available?)
• Dominating and pinning down pairs for topological spaces
• Separation and cardinality - some new results and old questions
• Verbal covering properties of topological spaces

This page was built for publication: Pinning down versus density

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q501845)