Structured versus decorated cospans

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5045911



Abstract: One goal of applied category theory is to understand open systems. We compare two ways of describing open systems as cospans equipped with extra data. First, given a functor LcolonmathsfAomathsfX, a "structured cospan" is a diagram in mathsfX of the form L(a)ightarrowxleftarrowL(b). If mathsfA and mathsfX have finite colimits and L preserves them, it is known that there is a symmetric monoidal double category whose objects are those of mathsfA and whose horizontal 1-cells are structured cospans. Second, given a pseudofunctor FcolonmathsfAomathbfCat, a "decorated cospan" is a diagram in mathsfA of the form aightarrowmleftarrowb together with an object of F(m). Generalizing the work of Fong, we show that if mathsfA has finite colimits and Fcolon(mathsfA,+)o(mathsfCat,imes) is symmetric lax monoidal, there is a symmetric monoidal double category whose objects are those of mathsfA and whose horizontal 1-cells are decorated cospans. We prove that under certain conditions, these two constructions become isomorphic when we take mathsfX=intF to be the Grothendieck category of F. We illustrate these ideas with applications to electrical circuits, Petri nets, dynamical systems and epidemiological modeling.












This page was built for publication: Structured versus decorated cospans

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5045911)