Accuracy monism and doxastic dominance: reply to Steinberger

DOI10.1093/ANALYS/ANZ075zbMATH Open1497.03027OpenAlexW3035219521WikidataQ127182313 ScholiaQ127182313MaRDI QIDQ5046255FDOQ5046255

Authors: Matthew Hewson 

Publication date: 28 October 2022

Published in: Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anz075

Recommendations

• Accuracy and epistemic conservatism
• Repugnant accuracy
• Accuracy, conditionalization, and probabilism
• Accuracy-First Epistemology Without Additivity
• On the Best Accuracy Arguments for Probabilism

zbMATH Keywords

closurelottery paradoxpreface paradoxdeductive cogencyaccuracy epistemologyepistemic conservatism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Utility theory (91B16) Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)

Cited In (3)

• Accuracy and epistemic conservatism
• All swamping, no problem
• Accurate believers are deductively cogent

This page was built for publication: Accuracy monism and doxastic dominance: reply to Steinberger

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5046255)