Abstract: Ehrenborg noted that all tilings of a bipartite planar graph are encoded by its cubical matching complex and claimed that this complex is collapsible. We point out to an oversight in his proof and explain why these complexes can be the union of collapsible complexes. Also, we prove that all links in these complexes are suspensions up to homotopy. Furthermore, we extend the definition of a cubical matching complex to planar graphs that are not necessarily bipartite, and show that these complexes are either contractible or a disjoint union of contractible complexes. For a simple connected region that can be tiled with dominoes ( and ) and squares, let denote the number of tilings with exactly squares. We prove that (established by Ehrenborg) is the only linear relation for the numbers .
Recommendations
Cites work
- Betti numbers of monomial ideals and shifted skew shapes
- Complexes of directed trees
- Complexes of directed trees and independence complexes
- Generalized Dehn-Sommerville relations for polytopes, spheres and Eulerian partially ordered sets
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3983158 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1975686 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 863503 (Why is no real title available?)
- Simplicial complexes of graphs
- Star clusters in independence complexes of graphs
- The cubical matching complex
- The topology of the independence complex
- Toric topology
Cited in
(6)- Matching complexes of polygonal line tilings
- The Bolzano property and the cube-like complexes
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5519218 (Why is no real title available?)
- The cubical matching complex
- General polygonal line tilings and their matching complexes
- The cube-like complexes and the Poincaré-Miranda theorem
This page was built for publication: The cubical matching complex revisited
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5074223)