Predictor versus response permutation for significance testing in weighted regression and redundancy analysis
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5086087
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3885093 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3551729 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1911036 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3223314 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3076948 (Why is no real title available?)
- An exact permutation method for testing any effect in balanced and unbalanced fixed effect ANOVA
- Biplots in Reduced‐Rank Regression
- Distributional equivalence and subcompositional coherence in the analysis of compositional data, contingency tables and ratio-scale measurements
- Exact testing with random permutations
- On Permutation Tests in Multiple Regression and Analysis of Covariance Problems
- On the Conditional Distribution of the Multivariate t Distribution
- Permutation Tests for Linear Models
- Permutation \(p\)-values should never be zero: calculating exact \(p\)-values when permutations are randomly drawn
- Principal component analysis of compositional data
- RANDOM PERMUTATION TESTING IN MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION
- Redundancy analysis: an alternative for canonical correlation analysis
- Sensitivity of MRQAP tests to collinearity and autocorrelation conditions
- Visualization and verbalization of data
Cited in
(1)
This page was built for publication: Predictor versus response permutation for significance testing in weighted regression and redundancy analysis
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5086087)