Predictor versus response permutation for significance testing in weighted regression and redundancy analysis
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5086087
DOI10.1080/00949655.2021.2019256OpenAlexW4200495071MaRDI QIDQ5086087FDOQ5086087
Authors: Cajo J. F. ter Braak 
Publication date: 1 July 2022
Published in: Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2021.2019256
permutation testweighted regressionredundancy analysiscanonical correspondence analysisweighted log-ratio analysis
Cites Work
- Principal component analysis of compositional data
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- An exact permutation method for testing any effect in balanced and unbalanced fixed effect ANOVA
- RANDOM PERMUTATION TESTING IN MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Permutation \(p\)-values should never be zero: calculating exact \(p\)-values when permutations are randomly drawn
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Redundancy analysis: an alternative for canonical correlation analysis
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Visualization and verbalization of data
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- On Permutation Tests in Multiple Regression and Analysis of Covariance Problems
- Distributional equivalence and subcompositional coherence in the analysis of compositional data, contingency tables and ratio-scale measurements
- Permutation Tests for Linear Models
- Exact testing with random permutations
- On the Conditional Distribution of the Multivariate t Distribution
- Sensitivity of MRQAP tests to collinearity and autocorrelation conditions
- Biplots in Reduced‐Rank Regression
Cited In (1)
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Predictor versus response permutation for significance testing in weighted regression and redundancy analysis
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5086087)
