On the parameterized complexity of contraction to generalization of trees

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5111860

DOI10.4230/LIPICS.IPEC.2017.1zbMATH Open1435.68120arXiv1708.00622OpenAlexW2909582894MaRDI QIDQ5111860FDOQ5111860

Prafullkumar Tale, Saket Saurabh, Akanksha Agrawal

Publication date: 27 May 2020

Abstract: For a family of graphs calF, the mathcalF-Contraction problem takes as an input a graph G and an integer k, and the goal is to decide if there exists SsubseteqE(G) of size at most k such that G/S belongs to calF. Here, G/S is the graph obtained from G by contracting all the edges in S. Heggernes et al.~[Algorithmica (2014)] were the first to study edge contraction problems in the realm of Parameterized Complexity. They studied calF-Contraction when calF is a simple family of graphs such as trees and paths. In this paper, we study the mathcalF-Contraction problem, where calF generalizes the family of trees. In particular, we define this generalization in a "parameterized way". Let mathbbTell be the family of graphs such that each graph in mathbbTell can be made into a tree by deleting at most ell edges. Thus, the problem we study is mathbbTell-Contraction. We design an FPT algorithm for mathbbTell-Contraction running in time mathcalO((2sqrt(ell))mathcalO(k+ell)cdotnmathcalO(1)). Furthermore, we show that the problem does not admit a polynomial kernel when parameterized by k. Inspired by the negative result for the kernelization, we design a lossy kernel for mathbbTell-Contraction of size mathcalO([k(k+2ell)](lceilfracalphaalpha1ceil+1)).


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.00622




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (2)





This page was built for publication: On the parameterized complexity of contraction to generalization of trees

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5111860)