An examination of performance relations among selected consistency measures for simulated pairwise judgments

DOI10.1007/S10479-016-2131-6MaRDI QIDQ512951zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Paul Thaddeus Kazibudzki

Publication date 3 March 2017

Published in Annals of Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2131-6

zbMATH Keywords

consistencyMonte Carlo methodsanalytic hierarchy processjudgmentmultiple criteria decision making

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Decision theory (91B06)

Recommendations

• A new measure of consistency for positive reciprocal matrices
• A METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE CONSISTENCY OF JUDGEMENTS
• Consistency stability intervals for a judgement in AHP decision support systems
• CONSISTENCY IN THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS: A NEW APPROACH
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2086188

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3943488 (Why is no real title available?)
• A common framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matrices
• A comparative study of the numerical scales and the prioritization methods in AHP
• A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP
• A new definition of consistency of pairwise comparisons
• A note on the analysis of subjective judgement matrices
• A revised framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matrices
• An improved statistical approach for consistency test in AHP
• Analysis of pairwise comparison matrices: an empirical research
• Bridging the gap between missing and inconsistent values in eliciting preference from pairwise comparison matrices
• Comparison of statistical procedures in analytic hierarchy process using a ranking test.
• Deriving weights from general pairwise comparison matrices
• Goal programming models for obtaining the priority vector of incomplete fuzzy preference relation
• How relevant is the lack of reciprocity in pairwise comparisons? An experiment with AHP
• How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process
• Inconsistency indices for pairwise comparison matrices: a numerical study
• Interval estimation of priorities in the AHP
• Measurement and preference function modelling
• Nonlinear programming applied to the reduction of inconsistency in the AHP method
• On Saaty's and Koczkodaj's inconsistencies of pairwise comparison matrices
• Systemic decision making in AHP: a Bayesian approach
• The geometric consistency index: approximated thresholds
• The precise consistency consensus matrix in a local AHP-group decision making context

Cited in

(6)

• Measures of consistency for DEMATEL method
• Consistency stability intervals for a judgement in AHP decision support systems
• A general formulation for some inconsistency indices of pairwise comparisons
• An action learning approach for assessing the consistency of pairwise comparison data
• Relationship between priority ratios disturbances and priority estimation errors
• Balancing consistency and expert judgment in AHP

This page was built for publication: An examination of performance relations among selected consistency measures for simulated pairwise judgments

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q512951)