Type I and type II error rates in the last observation carried forward method under informative dropout

DOI10.1080/02664763.2015.1063112MaRDI QIDQ5137997zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Chandan Saha, Michael P. Jones

Publication date 3 December 2020

Published in Journal of Applied Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2015.1063112

zbMATH Keywords

clinical trialincomplete datainformative dropoutlongitudinal studyrepeated measurements

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Recommendations

• Bias in the last observation carried forward method under informative dropout
• Marginal Analysis of Incomplete Longitudinal Binary Data: A Cautionary Note on LOCF Imputation
• Last observation analysis in ANOVA and ANCOVA
• A comparison of the random-effects pattern mixture model with last-observation-carried-forward(locf) analysis in longitudinal clinical trials with dropouts
• Modeling the Drop-Out Mechanism in Repeated-Measures Studies

Cites work

• Analyzing incomplete longitudinal clinical trial data
• Bias in the last observation carried forward method under informative dropout
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 274399 (Why is no real title available?)
• Intent-to-Treat Analysis for Longitudinal Studies with Drop-Outs
• Marginal Analysis of Incomplete Longitudinal Binary Data: A Cautionary Note on LOCF Imputation
• Maximum Likelihood Approaches to Variance Component Estimation and to Related Problems
• Random-Effects Models for Longitudinal Data

Cited in

(1)

• Bias in the last observation carried forward method under informative dropout

This page was built for publication: Type I and type II error rates in the last observation carried forward method under informative dropout

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5137997)